Hey,
Sasha here with the pleasure of delivering you some recent industry takeaways from April.
Unfortunately, it’s not all sunshine and rainbows in this edition of HIDDEN WISDOM #05.
Euripides once said “time will explain it all” in Aeolus back in 450 BC. Whatever he was referring to surely took longer than OpenAI to show its cracks. In roughly one quarter, the poster-child of the AI race posted its first real signs of strain.
OpenAI is now facing an existential crisis fueled by financial turmoil, legal troubles, and desperate pivots aside. Considering the incestuous commercial arrangements between LLM, Compute, and Hardware companies, the market reacted just about as you’d expect - quite strongly.
But are these surface cracks indicative of a bigger problem around AI?
Let’s dive in.

First we need to look at three things:
The Crunch: a rapidly unfolding energy problem
The Backlash: cultural and economic pushback
The Response: doubling down anyway
Let’s Think About the Robots
AI-related layoffs have steadily increased over the past six months.
Oracle cut 30,000 employees (~18% of workforce), citing AI-driven efficiencies
Amazon reached similar levels of layoffs across corporate and tech roles
Meta followed with another 8,000 cuts in April (~10% of workforce)
The language is consistent in every story. Efficiency, optimization, automation.
The underlying story is less polished. Markets have been volatile, fiscal years have been weaker than expected, and AI is increasingly being used to justify restructuring that likely would have happened anyway.
The narrative around AI has outrun the product. A recent Princeton paper challenged the reliability of AI agents, pointing to inconsistent outputs and the continued need for human oversight. That doesn’t eliminate their value, but it does raise questions about how quickly they can fully replace human labor.
This leaves companies in an awkward position. Workforce decisions have already been made, while the actual efficiency gains are still playing out. And layered on top of this is a constraint that is much harder to ignore.
Energy.
The Backlash
Energy demand has risen sharply, driven by increased compute usage and broader geopolitical pressure.
At the same time, model developers continue to prioritize performance over efficiency. Anthropic’s upcoming Mythos model is expected to cost 5.5x more to run than its previous model. Industry commentary is starting to reflect this imbalance, with Nvidia’s Bryan Catanzaro noting that the cost of compute is now “far beyond” the cost of human employees in many cases.
The general sentiment toward AI is shifting:
Protests like “March Against The Machines” in London
Legal challenges against data center infrastructure, including xAI in Memphis ([link])
More extreme reactions tied to fears around AI’s broader impact

Doubling-Down
Despite these signals, companies are not slowing down. If anything, they’re leaning in harder.
Energy is becoming a strategic resource, and the response has been aggressive:
New data centers across the US and Brazil
Space-based solar initiatives to power AI infrastructure
SpaceX narratives shifting toward energy and compute infrastructure
We’re now seeing a world where AI expansion is directly tied to energy infrastructure buildout.
But experimentation hasn’t slowed. An AI-run business in San Francisco recently operated with minimal human oversight, making decisions across hiring and spending.
Setting the Stage
The current state of AI is not a clean exponential curve.
Token consumption has started to flatten against the increasing complexity of new model releases. Companies are moving slower than expected in replacing payroll, costs remain high relative to outcomes, and adoption is happening, but unevenly. None of this breaks the long-term trajectory, though.

Marc Andreessen’s idea that AI will eat application software still holds. AI is reducing the cost and complexity of building software, pushing the opportunity away from foundational models and toward the application layer.
The companies seeing traction are solving real business problems, moving quickly with smaller teams, and iterating faster than traditional development cycles allow. That’s also where capital is concentrating.
Arcanum Ventures believes the focus should be on AI-enabled applications that solve real business problems. In that sense, AI is becoming the next generation of software. And despite the broader concerns, areas like data authentication, privacy, and secure communication continue to present billion-dollar opportunities.
I’m hoping our insights help guide you through these uncertain markets.

Our thoughts in April
We dove deeper into our 2026 thesis this month, covering industries like Prediction Markets, Robotics, and other investment focus areas. And as always, we offered practical guidance for founders around storytelling.

Billions are flowing into robotics and embodied AI, and governments are treating these systems as critical infrastructure. But outside of controlled demos, the real world is still a harder problem than the headlines suggest. Here is where the technology actually stands in 2026.

Kalshi and Polymarket hit $2.35 billion in weekly trading volume at their peak. They are valued at a combined $37 billion. And depending on where you live, they might be completely illegal. Here is what prediction markets actually are and what they are becoming.
We Covered Emerging Stories On the Tech Frontier
Weekly recaps are on fire as listeners tune in to hear our takes on recent technology news and what the future holds for venture capital.
The themes we’ve been seeing over the past few weeks:
Defense tech is more important now than ever as the race to space defense is kicked off
AI applications are only limited by creativity as people solve problems they know well
OpenAI and SpaceX are in the race for the first +$1 Trillion IPO
Anti-AI Sentiment is Growing
Protesters in the streets, founder attacks, and leaks highlighted the past month. AI is full team ahead without any guardrails in place.
Making Decisions on Her Own
The industry is not lacking for innovation as founders continue to find novel use cases for AI infrastructure while testing social boundaries.
And Some Incredible Panel Discussions on X
Carmelo took the stage to cover a range of topics and guide debate over some major happenings within the world of technology.
As wearable technologies ramp up, it seems augmented reality infrastructure is taking the backseat. The industry seems to be focusing more and more on AI enablement as thought leaders claim that AGI is already here.
The reasoning? We can build billion-dollar apps….


Meta announced the death of its metaverse after pouring over $80 billion into a project that went nowhere.


Jensen Huang and others claim that AGI is finally here, but do they have some financial interest in the game?
Thanks for sticking with me!
This month leaned more negative than usual, but it reflects a broader adjustment. AI is not slowing down. It’s becoming more constrained, more expensive, and more grounded in reality.
For investors focused on fundamentals rather than momentum, that shift creates a clearer picture of where opportunities actually exist.
Thanks for sticking with me and happy May everybody.
- Sasha Asheghi -


